Estelle Cascino vs Pareen Shivekar Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W L L L
Form
W L L L L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Cascino 1 - 0 Shivekar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cascino winning 2 and Shivekar winning 0. The last match between Cascino and Shivekar was at the Pune, 12-12-2016, Q1 round, Hard with Estelle Cascino getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Estelle Cascino | 1 |
| Pareen Shivekar | 0 |
Pune(12-12-2016)
6
2
6
1
| Cascino | Stats | Shivekar |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 855 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 406 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 29 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (268-221) | Career Total W/L | 39% (15-23) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Ruud PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Estelle Cascino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Angelina Wirges
Player
Estelle Cascino
31%
(
5 of
16)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
21
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
Player
Estelle Cascino
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Estelle Cascino
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Estelle Cascino
Player
Noelia Zeballos
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Monnot
Player
Estelle Cascino
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Estelle Cascino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Estelle Cascino
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
32 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Estelle Cascino
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Estelle Cascino
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pareen Shivekar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jia Qi Kang
Player
Pareen Shivekar
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pareen Shivekar
Player
Mihika Yadav
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Pareen Shivekar
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
46 of
58)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Freya Christie
Player
Pareen Shivekar
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pareen Shivekar
Player
Niditra Rajmohan
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
14
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
48
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alicia Smith
Player
Pareen Shivekar
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bunyawi Thamchaiwat
Player
Pareen Shivekar
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pareen Shivekar
Player
Chie Kezuka
86%
(
63 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (268/221) | Win/Loss | 39% (15/23) |
| 54% (592/513) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (34/48) |
| 52% (5053/4685) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (342/396) |
| 63% (130/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (14/20) |
| 53% (117/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 34% (19/37) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 440 | Aces Total | 3 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 864 | Total Double Faults | 40 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 578.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 383.79 |
| 62% (11798/18922) | 1st Serve % | 70% (450/640) |
| 60% (7082/11798) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (215/450) |
| 45% (3231/7124) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (74/190) |
| 49% (1196/2463) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (31/79) |
| 47% (8773/18823) | Return Points Win % | 44% (278/638) |
| 0% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (132/139) | Challenger W/L | 29% (5/12) |
| 64% (136/76) | Futures W/L | 48% (10/11) |
| 55% (263/479) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (31/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 56% (73/131) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 89% (254/227) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (14/14) |
| 11% (254/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (14/0) |
| 17% (235/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (24/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
